翻訳と辞書 Words near each other ・ British League Division Two Riders Championship ・ British League Knockout Cup ・ British League of Ex-Servicemen and Women ・ British League of Racing Cyclists ・ British League of Rights ・ British League Pairs Championship ・ British League Riders' Championship ・ British Leeward Islands ・ British Left ・ British Legion (American Revolution) ・ British Legion (disambiguation) ・ British Legion Volunteer Police Force ・ British Legions ・ British Leyland ・ British Leyland ECV3 ・ British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Co ・ British Leyland UK Ltd v Swift ・ British Library ・ British Library Coptic Language Collection ・ British Library Ediciones Vigía Collection ・ British Library Leyden Medical Dissertations Collection ・ British Library of Political and Economic Science ・ British Library Or 4926 ・ British Library Philatelic Collections ・ British Library Philatelic Department Photograph Collection ・ British Library Preservation Advisory Centre ・ British Library Sound Archive ・ British Library Sounds ・ British Library Syriac Manuscript Collection ・ British Library, Add. 12137 Dictionary Lists mini英和辞書 mini和英辞書 Webster 1913 Latin-English FOLDOC Wikipedia English ウィキペディア

翻訳と辞書　辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ] スポンサード リンク British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Co ： ウィキペディア英語版 British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Co ''British Leyland Motor Corp. v Armstrong Patents Co.'' is a 1986 decision of the House of Lords concerning the doctrine of non-derogation from grants. This doctrine is comparable to, but somewhat broader than, the doctrine of legal estoppel, assignor estoppel, or estoppel by deed in U.S. law. Under the doctrine of non-derogation from grants, a seller of realty or (after this decision) goods is not permitted to take any action (such as bringing an infringement action) that would lessen the value to the buyer of the thing sold. ==Background== The factual context of the ''Leyland'' case was that Leyland, the owner of copyright in drawings of the tailpipe of a motor car (the Leyland "Marina"), having sold or authorized the sale of the motor car, sought to use the law against copyright infringement to prevent the aftermarket sale of replacement tailpipes to purchasers of those motor cars. Leyland's cars reproduced the drawings in a three dimensional form. Armstrong copied the tailpipe of Leyland's car and thus indirectly copied the drawings. Leyland sued Armstrong to enjoin the copying. 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「British Leyland Motor Corp v Armstrong Patents Co」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク 翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.